- HOME
- Continuous Improvement Roadmap
Güncelleme Tarihi: 10 September 2025
Visitors: 13
Continuous Improvement Roadmap
ECONOMICS (Turkish) UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM — CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT ROADMAP
The sections below present the Planning , Implementation , Control and Action/Improvement steps of the continuous improvement cycle for the Economics (Turkish) undergraduate curriculum.
1.1. Students
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Student profile is monitored and used as input for quota planning. | Domestic and international admissions are carried out systematically and institutionally in line with applicable regulations. | Quantitative data by various variables (including high school type) are maintained regularly; quota fill rates are tracked. | Curriculum adjustments and quota planning are made based on trends in student profile. |
1.2. Horizontal/Vertical Transfer, Double Major (ÇAP) & Minor
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Quota planning complies with regulations, supported by guidelines; an implementation system has been developed. | All application and placement processes are documented transparently and clearly. | Quantitative monitoring is conducted and numbers of enrolled students are checked. Monitoring also includes Double Major/Minor surveys. | Quotas for relevant intakes are monitored; improvement suggestions are obtained via Academic Advisory Board meetings. |
1.3. International & National Student Exchange
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Quota planning complies with regulations, supported by guidelines; an implementation system has been developed. | All application and placement processes are documented transparently and clearly. | Quantitative monitoring is conducted. | Process improvements are made based on student feedback and advisor observations. |
1.4. Academic Advising (Registration Advising)
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Advisor assignments, role definitions, and office hours are systematically planned. | The process is conducted through presentations, meetings, and forms. | Perceived satisfaction is monitored via surveys, meeting minutes, and student feedback. | Evaluations and recommendations are produced through the Academic Advising Board. |
1.5. Career Counseling Service
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
The counseling structure is defined; center-supported and in-program mechanisms are established. | The program provides career counseling; individual counseling via KAGEM, the Career Planning course, club activities, and events are conducted. | The process is monitored through satisfaction surveys and reporting. | Survey results are evaluated with the Academic Advisors Board and fed into decision-making processes. |
1.6. Measuring & Assessing Student Course Achievement
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Assessment–evaluation principles are set in accordance with legal regulations. | Exams and grading are carried out within this framework. | Exam results and graduation audits are systematically monitored. | The system is continuously improved through instructor exam reports and preliminary graduation evaluations. |
1.7. System Verifying Graduation Requirements
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Graduation criteria are clearly defined and communication mechanisms have been established. | A dual-control system is run via transcripts; a graduation commission is appointed. | The process is reviewed at year-end and for exceptional cases, and documented with minutes. | Department board decisions are taken to resolve issues in the process. |
2. Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
PEOs are determined based on mission, STAR, and strategic goals with internal/external stakeholder input, and publicly announced. A measurement system and implementation plan are in place. | PEOs are defined to inform the curriculum and PLOs; supported by co-curricular activities. | Monitored via surveys and employment data; alumni surveys; exam evaluation reports (mapping matrices) and stakeholder feedback. | Updated every 5 years through stakeholder input and employment analyses; the system is revised per the periodic observation plan. |
3. Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
An 8-outcome system aligned with TYYÇ, STAR, and PLOs was planned with stakeholder participation and announced. A measurement system and implementation plan were established. | Implemented by directly linking to the curriculum (Course–PLO mapping). | Monitored through pre-graduation evaluations, exam analyses, and surveys. The Assessment & Evaluation Committee runs the two-track structure. | Updated on a 5-year cycle; where needed, course content, assessment system, and the curriculum are reviewed annually. |
4. Program Curriculum
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
The curriculum is structured and classified to support the PLOs and PEOs. | Implemented with a knowledge–skills–competence balance; lecture and exam-oriented methods predominate. | Course–PLO contribution analyses; regular course/instructor surveys are conducted and reported. | The plan is updated annually; course allocations are discussed at the start of the term; methods/assessments are revised using survey and exam reports; “Training of Trainers” enriches pedagogy. |
4.5. Internship Practice
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
A functioning system for voluntary internships is defined; responsible persons and structures are set. | Applications are made via “Kariyer Kapısı”; advising and information activities are conducted. | Feedback is collected through Academic Advisor and Student Development Opportunities surveys; external stakeholder and student views are monitored. | Visibility of voluntary internships has been increased; academic advisor briefings have started; an alumni communication system has been established. |
5. Teaching Staff
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Staff qualifications are defined; numbers, distribution, and roles are systematically planned; performance evaluation is institutionalized. | Tasks are allocated by expertise; advising–research–teaching are carried out effectively; outputs are pursued per 2021–2025 targets. | Annual reports, duty schedules, activity tables; publications–projects–training and development documents are monitored; the assessment committee conducts exam/evaluation surveys. | Development programs for strengthening staff and increasing scholarly output; web announcements/incentives; Training of Trainers to support access to PLOs. |
6. On-Campus Life & Student Facilities
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Capacity and space planning are made per program needs; distance education is planned for continuity and flexibility. | Technological infrastructure is actively used; student access is ensured. | Tracked via the Student Services & Campus Life survey; deficiencies are reported to relevant units. | Requests based on feedback are forwarded to relevant units and the process is followed up. |
8. Organizational Structure
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
The organizational structure, commission duties, and decision mechanisms are structured. | Processes are conducted through systematic meetings and official decision documents. | The impact of decisions regarding program educational objectives on implementation is monitored. | Processes are updated through commission reports, web announcements, and periodic evaluations. |
9. Distance Education Services
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Capacity/space planning is done per program needs; after pandemic/earthquake, a synchronous–asynchronous structure was planned for uninterrupted access. | Technological infrastructure is actively used; access is ensured. | Tracked via the Student Services & Campus Life survey; deficiencies are reported to the relevant unit based on results. | Requests based on feedback have been forwarded; user guides ensure uninterrupted access to classes. |
10. Program-Specific Criteria (PSCs)
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
A four-criterion system aligned with TYYÇ, STAR, and PEOs was planned with stakeholder participation and announced. A measurement system and implementation plan were established. | Implemented by directly linking to the curriculum (Course–PSC mapping). | Monitored through pre-graduation evaluations, exam analyses, and surveys; the Assessment & Evaluation Committee runs the two-track structure. | Updated on a 5-year cycle; where needed, the curriculum, course contents, and assessment system are reviewed annually. |
11. Continuous Improvement
Planning | Implementation | Control | Action/Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
An annual accreditation/improvement calendar is prepared; planning is based on student analysis and satisfaction data. | Implementation is conducted through student satisfaction surveys, advising interviews, board/commission meetings, and department board decisions. | Follow-up is performed via an implementation tracking system (e.g., Double Major applications, surveys) and board/commission evaluations. | Identified issues are addressed with periodic solutions and converted into scheduled improvements. |